Identify capacity in financial crime operations before investing in technology

Pyze measures how KYC, transaction monitoring and payments investigations are performed, identifies where AI agents apply, and measures the result after deployment.

8,000
analysts measured in a single European bank
250K+
annual hours identified
€5M+
annual savings identified
6 weeks
from instrumentation to a priced opportunity register

Measured in a single European bank engagement across financial crime operations. Identified value; realized value is tracked separately against the same baseline.

Financial crime teams are measured on alerts cleared and cases closed, which does not show how the work is performed. The variation between two analysts on the same case type is often wider than the variation between a strong quarter and a weak one, and it is not visible in the case management system.

Common Findings in Banking & Financial Services

Four patterns that recur across engagements, each shown with the measurement and the resulting change.

Every case receives the same quality check regardless of risk.

Simplify
What the measurement shows

Return rates from second-line review are flat across segments and do not rise with customer complexity. Uniform checking does not improve risk coverage.

What changes

Full second review is reserved for the segments and triggers that produce returns, and the remainder is sampled. The control becomes stronger and less costly.

Screening produces more matches than analysts can review, and most are discounted.

Agentify
What the measurement shows

The discounting follows a documented disposition rule, which makes it a candidate for an AI agent.

What changes

An agent performs first-pass triage against the written rule and presents only the matches that need judgement. Each agent decision is recorded on the case with its rationale, so the control remains auditable.

Two analysts close the same case type, and one takes a third longer than the other.

Standardize
What the measurement shows

The difference is the order of lookups and knowing which register answers the ownership question. Both can be taught quickly and neither requires a system change.

What changes

The top quartile technique becomes the documented standard, and conformance is scored continuously instead of sampled in an annual review.

The measured workload at one end of the team is three times that at the other.

Rebalance
What the measurement shows

Part of the difference is explained by role. The remainder is imbalance, verified case by case against each analyst’s measured day.

What changes

Work is rebalanced within a role and segment, capped at what the busiest analyst already carries. Capacity is released with no technology spend.

Opportunity Register

A sample register, sorted by the lever that resolves each opportunity. In an engagement, each line carries measured hours, a named owner and the evidence it was derived from.

Risk-tiered quality control
Simplify
Second-line review scoped to the segments that produce returns.
Screening match triage
Agentify
First-pass disposition against the documented rule, judgement retained by the analyst.
Registry and ownership lookup
Standardize
One documented path through the corporate registries instead of individual analyst practice.
Periodic review scheduling
Automate
Refresh triggers generated from the risk model instead of a manual schedule.
Document chase correspondence
Agentify
Outreach drafted from the case position and followed up to a deadline.
Case ownership rebalancing
Rebalance
Load levelled within role and segment against the measured day.
Adverse media disposition
Agentify
Relevance assessed against stated criteria, escalation on ambiguity.
Evidence pack assembly
Automate
Audit file compiled from the record instead of assembled by hand.
Automate and Agentify are distinct findings. Scheduling a report is deterministic work with a stated rule. Diagnosing an exception is a decision. Separating the two prevents a register from over-scoping the first and missing the second.

Systems typically instrumented

FenergoPegaSalesforceWorld-CheckActimizeMainframe / core bankingCorporate registry portalsExcel and Outlook

Capture covers browser-delivered and thick-client applications, including virtualized estates, with no change to how anyone works.

Roles Involved

Financial Crime OperationsKYC and CDD analystsTransaction monitoringSecond-line assuranceOperational excellence

Instrumentation is configured per application rather than per person, so the population in scope is set during scoping and is not a deployment constraint.

How an Engagement Runs

Baseline, blueprint, transform, prove

The same four stages apply in every sector. The fourth stage repeats the baseline measurement, which makes the engagement an ongoing operating capability rather than a one-time report.

01

Baseline

What the work costs today, measured across every person and application.

02

Blueprint

Procedures, application rules and execution evidence, read as one target state.

03

Transform

Where each of the five levers applies, priced and owned.

04

Prove

The after state measured against the baseline, using the same method.

Proof

Financial and economic crime optimisation

8,000 analysts across KYC, transaction monitoring and payments. 250,000 annual hours and more than €5M in savings identified, with the conformance baseline left in place to measure what the remediation recovered.

Read the walkthrough

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this require access to customer data?
No. Capture is pseudonymous by design, with no PII and no content capture. The same deployment can therefore run onshore, offshore and under a works council on identical terms.
Task mining is not permitted under our corporate standards. Does that rule Pyze out?
No. Pyze instruments the application layer directly instead of recording the desktop, and several regulated customers deploy Pyze because conventional task mining was not approved.
How is the benchmark set?
Against your own top quartile on comparable work, scoped by role and case type. The benchmark is an internal, like-for-like standard and not a figure from another institution.

Start with a measured baseline

Six weeks from instrumentation to a priced opportunity register, and the baseline stays in place so later quarters are measured rather than re-estimated.